Review of the relevant legal framework to address the misuse of deepfake technology
Articles 4, 13, 18, 20, 65
Implementing regulations not yet issued. Supervisory authority not established.
Articles 14–17, 27, 29
Takedown process is difficult and slow. Confusion about procedure requiring police report first.
Articles 27(1), 27(3), 28(1)
Misused to silence critics, not to protect deepfake victims.
—
Slow and inconsistent response. Business model prioritizes engagement.